Friday, 19 April 2013

GNED 1403 Final


Anonymity on the Internet is a tough issue to discuss, as there are various different aspects to it.  Over the last 10 years, the Internet was notoriously known for anonymity because anyone can be anyone on the Internet.  Today, social media is pushing anonymity away, for example, Facebook encourages using your real name and as of recently, YouTube has been encouraging their users to switch from their usernames to their real names.  Within the last 15 years, Internet usage has increased exponentially and with that, no real manual on how to use it.  In short, an exponential number of people being able to access the Internet, where there are no enforced rules or regulations – is a setup for trouble.  Anonymity on the Internet, allows people to express their opinions openly on public forums, which is a good thing, but it can also lead to racial, homophobic, sexist, and even bullying and criminal comments. To combat this behaviour, online groups such as Anonymous, “out” people by exposing the identities of the individuals who are responsible for their comments.  In some extreme cases, personal information (i.e. home address, work address, personal e-mail) has been posted on public forums as a form of “corrective action”.  To a certain extent, I do believe that this “corrective action” should be taken against the inappropriate comments mentioned previously, however, I don’t believe that Anonymous’ actions of posting personal information on a public forum is the right form of “corrective action”. 

Corrective action taken by the group known as Anonymous, such as “outing” people for their inappropriate and ignorant comments isn’t always the right action to take. Revealing the identities of racists, sexists, or homophobes doesn’t change the fact that they posted inappropriate comments in the first place, by revealing their identities, it doesn’t change the values or personal views – it only changes whether or not they choose to post their opinions on public forums.  Not to mention that it ostracizes and puts them in the spotlight for receiving criticism, which leaves the open possibility to create an adverse situation or make the situation much worse than it had been originally. 

The underlying problem of public forums is the extent of freedom of speech.  In Canada, as well as, the United States we have the right to freedom of speech and it applies to online forums as well.  In context, we are allowed to express our opinions in any media form.  This is the same to those who make inappropriate posts and comments online, whether if it’s racist, sexist, or homophobic – it is their opinion and they are free to express it.  The question still remains though, if it’s appropriate or not for those types of opinions to be expressed on a public medium.  Inevitably, everyone will have different opinions on various topics due to different values, culture and religion – even though all of the opinions are different everyone has a right to it.  Limiting what people say on the Internet is taking their right to free speech away.  Personally, I don’t think these types of opinions belong on a public forum as they spread hate and inequality among the community but I also believe that everybody has the right to free speech.  There is a time and place for everything and for those certain topics it applies.

Corrective action in online forums is a specialty for Anonymous.  Anonymous forces people to comply with the values of what they think are right through blackmail or other devices.  The Kylie Kylem incident is a good example; bullies from Kylie’s school were making horrible remarks about how Kylie should kill herself.  This incident escalated to the point where Anonymous took interest in it.  Anonymous took it in their hands and compiled the identities of the bullies and threatened to send it to authorities.  Though through the corrective action of Anonymous, they were successful in making the cyber bullying to stop but through the means of blackmail.  Blackmail is not a means of corrective action, though Anonymous was successful in resolving the Kylie incident through blackmail – I don’t believe that it’s the solution that people should resort to in solving problems.

Today, cyber bullying has become an increasing problem on the Internet media platform.  The Internet has become very integrated in our daily lives thus children have been allowed access to it.  Children are very vulnerable and impressionable and if they are educated at a young age about Internet safety it could potentially prevent cyber bullying before it starts.  Even though this isn’t a counter measure to combat inappropriate comments on the Internet, it has the potential to prevent the younger generation from making such remarks.  Another way to potentially combat inappropriate comments on the Internet, is educating the public about different cultures and religions.  Making the general public more aware of what each others cultural and religious values are, would make people more tolerant and understanding of those values. 

Even though anonymity has given us the freedom to express ourselves, we must keep in mind the responsibility of the things we say.  For example, those who express their racial, sexist or homophobic opinions on an online forum,  must be conscience of criticism that they will receive from the online community.  Freedom of speech is a right that everyone has, but it shouldn’t be taken advantage of.  There is a time and place for everything, including freedom of speech.  Corrective action such as education is the most sound and peaceful resolution, unlike blackmail in which Anonymous resorts to using.  We all have the right to exercise our right to freedom of speech; we just need to be mindful of what we say in the current time and place.

Sunday, 31 March 2013

joinStampede


The collective action that I wanted to talk about is the JoinStampede movement that is currently happening in the United States as we speak.  The reason why I picked this collective action is that it deals with student debt and a lot of people can relate to it - as most of us take out student loans to pay for post secondary education.  Currently in the United States, student debt exceeds over one trillion dollars and in my opinion, that is an obscene amount of money for one to owe.  In the United States there are typically two solutions to mitigate the burden of student loans, which are bankruptcy relief, or a full-out student loan bailout – both of which destroys credit ratings.  Launched in the beginning of March, JoinStampede is trying to get one hundred thousand people to join their movement and as a group they would collectively negotiate better terms for student loans.  JoinStampede not only targets those who are currently enrolled in post-secondary but also those who have an outstanding student debt that they are currently paying off.  It is needless to say that by having better interest rates students can pay off their loans faster.

Because this is a collective action in progress, the result of this collective action is unknown however it creates awareness of how much students owe in student loans and how much it costs to go to post-secondary in the United States.  Even if this collective action does fail, it may stir up other collective actions that may succeed in the near future.  Collective action can be a powerful tool in changing policy and legislation.  By having a large population rallying for a common cause it creates awareness and attention to the cause.  With awareness and attention to the cause, there is a higher potential for the collective action to succeed.  I like JoinStampede’s idea of a group of people collectively negotiating for lower interest rates and I hope that this campaign is successful, as it will benefit a lot of American students in the long run.  I believe that education is key in creating a more understanding and open-minded society.  By having more people being able to pay off their student loans at a better rate will encourage people to get an education.  

Wednesday, 27 March 2013

Last 2 weeks

Okay, so I have yet to have time to actually sit down and just let my fingers do it's thing.  Last 2 weeks have been crazy busy with school and not to mention that last weekend I got my wisdom teeth out so I've been in a semi vegetative state hopped up on Ibuprofen and T-3s.  There wasn't anything in-particular I wanted to talk about, but just wanted to check in with everyone and to let people know that I'm still alive despite the lack of Google+ activity!

Happy Wednesday everyone! We're almost done!

Thursday, 14 March 2013

RPG!

Memes may be the longest running trend on the Internet. There are millions, if not billions of meme's that can be found on all social media including Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr and now Instagram. A recent meme that was founded just under a year ago was the "Ridiculously Photogenic Guy" aka. RPG. The original picture was taken at Cooper River Bridge Run on March 31, 2012 by a photographer and computer programmer Will King. King uploaded a set of almost 100 photographs taken at the run onto Flickr and Facebook. One of King's friends commented on this particular photo, thus dubbing the man in the photograph, who was later revealed as Zeddie Little as the, "Ridiculously Handsome Guy". King uploaded a cropped version of just Little on Reddit with the title, "My friends call him, 'Mr. Ridiculously Handsome Guy'" which received over 40 000 votes. King also posted this picture with the same title on Flickr and within an hour received 300 000 views. Days later, Quickmeme received over 1000 submissions of RPG. The meaning behind this meme is that the "ridiculous photogenic guy" is so incredibly handsome he could have anything he wants and that everyone (male or female) would want him. There have been several different spinoffs to this meme, such as, "Ridiculously Photogenic Surgery Girl", "Ridiculously Photogenic Metal Head" and "Ridiculously Photogenic Syrian Rebel". All of which have the same meaning where they could have anything they want and that everyone wants them because they are incredibly photogenic. On April 4, 2012, Little was interviewed on Good Morning America and he announced that he was going to run in the New York City Marathon and raise money for the John Ritter Aortic Health Foundation. I think it's amazing that Little used his unpredicted Internet fame to raise money for charity. Seeing the meaning behind the meme, he used the context to his advantage to raise money for a good cause.





Tuesday, 5 March 2013

Running!

Okay, so I've decided to take up running and I'll be running the Scotiabank 10k run in May. I'm a new runner and I'm hoping that you guys can give me advice. I'm also curious to know about running form, I've heard of both toe-to-hell and then midfoot striking, which one is better?  But any information that you know about running, I would love to hear.

Cheers!

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

Guilty Conscious?

There are good people and bad people in this world, but being somewhat optimistic, I like to think there are more good people than there are bad.  But due to recent events that are indirect with my life, I've come to question that.  How can these "bad" people be the way they are and be okay with it? "Bad" is a very loose term as everyone's definition of "bad" is different, but I'm pretty sure everyone has had this though run through their mind at some point in their life.  I'm not saying that I am perfect in any way; I am human and I have my faults.  To be perfectly honest I have done bad things in my life and then my guilty conscious eats me alive which then forces me to apologize and make up for my bad deed.  I may not be perfect, but I know that deep down in my core I am a good person.  And I think due to my guilty conscious I am more reluctant to do bad things. But my question remains, how can bad people be they way they are and be okay with who they are?  Is it because they believe what they are doing is good/right?  Or because they have no guilty conscious? I know that there isn't a definite answer to my question, but I am curious to read the responses that I get.

Have a good evening everyone and good luck with midterms!


Sunday, 10 February 2013

You can't always believe what you read

Blog Assignment #2

The website that I've chosen to analyze is Sun News. I found this website neutral as it included all different kinds of articles from politics, economics, and world news. A cue that I thought it gave a neutral perspective was the titles of the articles that are main page, none of them were putting down political parties or policial members like other newspapers. From browsing some of the new articles that are posted on the website, I think this website is well rounded with the various topics it discusses such as the economic summit that was held at Mount Royal, to the Keystone project, to Taiwan lifting the Saskatchewan poultry ban. In order to identify the political position a blog takes is by reading their entries and figuring out their opinion of the political system that they're subjected to. If it's a newspaper website, you can tell by what the authors write about what's happening in the political world and what their opinions are. My philosophy is that, "you can't always believe what you read", I find that most authors are biased and that's natural. But if I am interested in a topic, I take the initiative to read more than one article about the subject so I can see all the angles of the topic and then make my own judgements based on all the information that I've gathered.